Are Sat Navs Excuses for Motoring Offences?

Satellite Navigation Systems, commonly known as Sat Navs, have become an indispensable tool for modern motorists. They guide us through unfamiliar roads, help us avoid traffic jams, and provide estimated arrival times. However, these technological marvels are not without their share of controversies, especially when it comes to motoring offences. A recurring problem is the failure of Sat Navs to update new speed limits. While it’s not a defence, it can be used as a form of mitigation. In this article, we’ll explore the role of Sat Navs in motoring offences and whether they can genuinely serve as excuses or mitigating factors.

The Prevalence of Motoring Offences

Motoring offences encompass a broad spectrum of violations, from speeding and running red lights to more severe transgressions like careless driving and drink driving. While some offences are the result of deliberate actions by drivers, others can occur due to a lack of awareness or technical glitches in navigation systems.

The Role of Sat Navs

Sat Navs have revolutionised the way we navigate our world. These devices use GPS technology to pinpoint our location and provide turn-by-turn directions. They also offer real-time traffic updates and often display the speed limits on the roads we’re travelling. However, the accuracy of these speed limit displays can be contentious, as they rely on constantly changing data sources.

The Speed Limit Dilemma

One recurring issue with Sat Navs is their failure to update new speed limits promptly. Speed limits can change frequently due to roadworks, safety concerns, or legislative changes. Drivers who rely solely on their Sat Navs for speed limit information can find themselves unintentionally speeding in areas with recently reduced limits. In such cases, can Sat Navs be used as a valid excuse?

Mitigation vs. Defence

It’s essential to distinguish between using a Sat Nav as a defence, and as a form of mitigation. Defences imply that a driver is entirely blameless for their actions, while mitigation acknowledges that a mistake occurred but seeks to lessen the severity of the punishment..

Using a Sat Nav as a defence for a motoring offence is not accepted by law enforcement or the courts. Drivers are ultimately responsible for adhering to traffic laws, regardless of the information provided by their navigation systems. Ignorance of the law is not considered a valid defence.

On the other hand, using a Sat Nav as a form of mitigation can be more plausible. If a driver can demonstrate that they were relying on their Sat Nav for speed limit information and genuinely believed they were driving within the legal limit, it may lead to a reduction in the severity of the sentence. This can result in a lesser fine or a more lenient penalty.

Driver Responsibility

Ultimately, the responsibility for obeying traffic laws falls squarely on the shoulders of the driver. While Sat Navs are valuable tools, they should complement, not replace, a driver’s awareness of their surroundings. Drivers should always be vigilant and responsive to changing road conditions and speed limits.


Sat Navs have become an integral part of modern motoring, offering convenience and assistance to drivers worldwide. However, they are not foolproof and can sometimes fail to provide up-to-date information about speed limits, potentially leading to motoring offences. While using a Sat Nav as a defence for such offences is not accepted, it can serve as a form of mitigation when a driver genuinely believes they were driving within the legal limit. Nevertheless, it is crucial for drivers to remain responsible and aware of their surroundings, using Sat Navs as aids rather than substitutes for good judgement and adherence to traffic laws.

Regan Peggs
Latest posts by Regan Peggs (see all)